Quantcast
Channel: Artificial Intelligence
Viewing all 1375 articles
Browse latest View live

Why you shouldn't let the super-intelligent machines in 'Ex Machina' and 'The Avengers' freak you out

$
0
0

artificial intelligence robot

We've all seen the headlines.

Tech giants like Bill Gates and Elon Musk have been quoted as saying artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to "destroy us all" and that it's "humanity's biggest existential threat."

The problem is many of these quotes are taken out of context. Most experts don't think we're on the brink of being overrun by AI robots (though these supermachine's appearances in recent movies like Ex Machina aren't helping) — they're actually optimistic about the future of AI and what it will do for humanity.

But to tap into the benefit of AI (and avoid the doom and gloom of AI), we need to change the way we think about its development, Max Tegmark, founder of the Future of Life Institute, said during an episode of NPR's Science Friday.

"It's time to redefine the goal of AI away from making things as smart as possible as fast as possible to making things that are really going to be beneficial for society," Tegmark said. "The way I think about this is a race between the growing power of tech and the growing wisdom that we manage our tech with."

So as long as computer scientists start including safety research in AI development, the potential benefits are endless.

"The AI in our life today is providing only a small glimpse of the profound beneficial contributions to come," Eric Horvitz, managing director of Microsoft Research Lab, said during the episode.

Even the AI technology were developing right now has the potential to save thousands of lives, Horvitz said. Driverless cars could dramatically decrease the 30,000 roadway deaths per year in the US (it's about 1 million worldwide). AI could also help prevent the thousands of accidental deaths that happen every year at hospitals due to errors that come from handling the giant reams of patient records.

So on one hand we absolutely should be worried about what could go wrong with AI, but we can't forget the enormous benefits that come with it.

So while Gates, Musk, and other high profile scientists and futurists have made it clear that they believe AI is a risk, Tegmark says that everyone usually comes to the same conclusion:

"Of course we're concerned that this could be the worst thing ever to happen to humanity, but we're also very hopeful that this will be something really great if we do the right things now," Tegmark said.

And Horvitz said that after talking with Gates about AI, he felt like the two of them were in agreement: we shouldn't march ahead carefree, but we can still be largely optimistic about the future.

The Future of Life Institute is now funding AI safety research.

SEE ALSO: Some AI robots can already pass part of the Turing test

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: MIT has designed robots that can work alongside humans and learn from them


In the next 100 years 'computers will overtake humans' and we need to be prepared, says Stephen Hawking

$
0
0

Stephen Hawking

Theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking doesn't think humans will be the smartest thinkers on the planet 100 years from now.

Instead, computers are likely to surpass humans in artificial intelligence at some point within the next century, he said during a conference in London this week.

Here's what he said during Zeitgeist 2015 conference, according to a report in TechWorld:

"Computers will overtake humans with AI at some within the next 100 years. When that happens, we need to make sure the computers have goals aligned with ours."

This isn't the first time Hawking has spoken out about the topic of artificial intelligence and the potential threat it could pose. Back in December, he told the BBC that artificial intelligence "could spell the end of the human race." 

Hawking isn't the only tech and science thought leader who is worried about AI. Earlier this year, he signed an open letter alongside SpaceX and Tesla CEO Elon Musk urging caution when developing artificial intelligence moving forward. Bill Gates also revealed during an Ask Me Anything thread on Reddit that he agrees with Elon Musk on this topic, saying that we should be concerned about artificial intelligence. 

Physicist and entrepreneur Louis Del Monte made a remark similar to Hawking's when speaking with former Business Insider reporter Dylan Love last year, saying the following:

"Today there's no legislation regarding how much intelligence a machine can have, how interconnected it can be. If that continues, look at the exponential trend. We will reach the singularity in the timeframe most experts predict. From that point on you're going to see that the top species will no longer be humans, but machines."

Google CEO and cofounder Larry Page doesn't think the rise of artificial intelligence is necessarily a bad thing. When speaking with the Financial Times last year, he noted that the introduction of more machines into the workforce could benefit the economy:

"You can't wish away these things from happening, they are going to happen,"he told the Financial Times on the subject of artificial intelligence infringing on the job market. "You're going to have some very amazing capabilities in the economy. When we have computers that can do more and more jobs, it's going to change how we think about work. There's no way around that. You can't wish it away."

SEE ALSO: Google has a secret apartment in which Larry Page and Elon Musk meet to discuss crazy ideas about the future

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Benedict Cumberbatch And The Cast Of 'The Imitation Game' Have Mixed Feelings About Artificial Intelligence

The CEO of IBM just made a bold prediction about the future of artificial intelligence

$
0
0

IBM watson world of watson ginni rometty

Last week, Ginni Rometty, the chairman and CEO of IBM, stood on stage in front of a packed room and announced that she was going to make "a bold prediction."

"In the future, every decision that mankind makes is going to be informed by a cognitive system like Watson," she said, "and our lives will be better for it."

Listening in were the crowds of engineers, designers, doctors, bankers, researchers, and reporters that IBM had ferried over to a massive glass-and-steel structure on the banks of the East River in Brooklyn.

The occasion was a new event, World of Watson, designed to showcase the "ecosystem" of innovation happening around Watson, IBM's signature artificial-intelligence system.

Watson became famous in 2011 for beating Jeopardy! champion Ken Jennings at his own game. But now IBM has much larger plans for it, which Rometty was hinting at with her "bold prediction."

"Jeopardy! was all about answers," IBM Watson Group vice president Stephen Gold explained earlier in the day, describing how chefs were using Watson to develop new recipes. "This is all about discovery."

Chef Watson, however, is just a fun example of the kind of creative thinking Watson can be trained to do. Rometty made clear that the company's true aspirations are much larger and more consequential than what's for dinner.

watson jeopardy ibmThe World of Watson event drove this home. It suggested that cognitive systems have a place in almost any type of decision a person or company may be faced with, whether that involves buying a house, making an investment, developing a pharmaceutical drug, or designing a new toy.

"As Watson gets smarter, his ability to reason is going to exponentially increase," Rometty said. What will be really game changing won't be Watson's knack for recalling facts faster than even the most trivia-savvy human, but its ability to assist people with the complex and nuanced tasks of decision-making and analysis.

"Watson deals in the gray area, where there's not a perfect right and wrong answer," she continued. "That's the hardest thing we do as humans."

If Rometty's big prediction pans out, this — the gray area that was once our exclusive and often most-challenging domain — may eventually become much easier.

SEE ALSO: IBM's Watson computer can now do in a matter of minutes what it takes cancer doctors weeks to perform

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Benedict Cumberbatch And The Cast Of 'The Imitation Game' Have Mixed Feelings About Artificial Intelligence

APPLY NOW: Business Insider is hiring an editor who’s obsessed with space and engineering

$
0
0

spacesuit1

Do you have SpaceX reps on speed dial? Do lakes under Europa’s ice make your heart soar? Do you grumble over A.I. news invoking Skynet? Are you fascinated by the weird ways researchers are trying to build next-generation computers?

Business Insider is looking for a talented editor to join our science team. This person will focus primarily on space, engineering, robotics, computing and related topics.

As our space/engineering editor, you’ll help recruit and manage a team of 2-3 people who are as obsessed and talented as you are. In addition to editing, writing would be a top priority.

Consider applying if:

  • You have excellent writing and copy editing skills.
  • You have experience managing a team.
  • You can decrypt complex or esoteric developments and make science exciting for a general audience.
  • You generate more story ideas than you know what to do with, and find yourself writing day-two stories for the web on day one.
  • You can bring unique context to trending news and make those stories your own.
  • You know how to stay on top of a beat and quickly produce splashy, high-impact stories.
  • Multitasking is your middle name, and you thrive in a fast-paced, collaborative setting.
  • You’re interminably wowed by human ingenuity and obsessed with the future.

Our style is smart, conversational, exciting and geared toward non-scientists. Having an attention to detail and being efficient in a quick-turnaround environment are both skills required for this job. We also prize agility in and enthusiasm for tackling wildly different topics. As the leader of a small team, talents for efficient delegation and guidance are key. The role will also help the team establish and nurture productive, attention-grabbing beats.

While this position has regular office hours, the ideal candidate is always keeping an eye out for the next big story. After-hours duties may also include helping retain our Science Friday trivia champion title over rival publications.

Apply here if interested. Please include a resume, clips, and a cover letter telling us what excites you about science reporting.

The position is full-time in our New York City headquarters and comes with competitive compensation packages, complete with benefits.

SEE ALSO: Business Insider is hiring a cybersecurity reporter (along with some other great tech writing positions!

SEE ALSO: Apply now: Business Insider is hiring a digital culture editor

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: How Elon Musk and SpaceX plan to drastically reduce the cost of space flight

Elon Musk is terrified of what Larry Page is doing

Here's how accurately this robot can recognize what's going on in 11 photos

$
0
0

wooden robot ukraine

One of the most intriguing areas in artificial intelligence research is computer vision. From being an integral part of self-driving cars to allowing machines to guess your age, making it possible for software to see is a big deal.

Computer scientist Stephen Wolfram has released a new tool, the Wolfram Image Identification Project, that allows users to upload or link to an image and then see how well the computer can recognize what's going on in the picture.

In a blog post, Wolfram describes the underlying technology behind the project. Like many computer vision programs, Wolfram's project is built around an "artificial neural network": a software framework inspired by biological brains that excels at the kind of pattern recognition needed for computer vision. In Wolfram's case, the neural network was "trained" by being exposed to tens of millions of labeled images. As Wolfram puts it in the blog post,

"We don’t have any intrinsic way to describe an object like a chair. All we can do is just give lots of examples of chairs, and effectively say, 'Anything that looks like one of these we want to identify as a chair.' So in effect we want images that are 'close' to our examples of chairs to map to the name 'chair', and others not to.

We decided to try the algorithm out on a few images that were on the front page of Business Insider around 3:30 PM eastern time Tuesday afternoon.

In many cases, the image identifier was able to at least get the overall gist of the pictures. It classified the Twin Peaks restaurant in Texas that was the site of a grisly shootout between rival biker gangs as a "store":

twin peaks wolfram

It also correctly classified Hillary Clinton and Marissa Mayer as "people", although it wasn't able to identify them specifically by name:

hillary clinton wolfram

marissa mayer wolfram

The algorithm also correctly, if vaguely, identified Paris cafe Le Comptoir as a building:

restaurant wolfram

In a few situations, the algorithm completely ignored the people in an image, instead focusing on particular inanimate objects. Rather than noticing boxer Gennady Golovkin, the algorithm locked on to the glove on the boxer's hand, helpfully pulling up some extra info on boxing gloves:

boxer wolfram

Similarly, in this still from an upcoming KFC commercial, the algorithm ignored former "Saturday Night Live" actor Darrell Hammond's portrayal of Colonel Sanders and instead noticed the cars around him, identifying them as "transport":

colonel sanders and cars wolfram

In other cases, the algorithm got temptingly close but was just slightly off. It classified this Samsung smartphone as a "remote control," and as with the boxing glove, gave us some context:

samsung wolfram

On the subject of Tesla, the image identifier correctly noted that Tesla Motors CEO Elon Musk was standing in front of a car, but misclassified the car as a two-door coupe, rather than a four-door sedan. Still, pretty impressive:

tesla wolfram

Some images completely threw the algorithm off. The grey background and dark chyron on this NFL Network screenshot appear to have convinced the image classifier that New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft is in fact a clapperboard:

robert kraft wolfram

The algorithm also had trouble with more abstract items. The Yo app logo was parsed as "instrumentation":

yo logo wolfram

And this screenshot of leaked footage from the upcoming video game "Doom 4" showing a soldier in a desolate wasteland was interpreted as a "spider":

doom 4 wolfram

While image recognition and classification are hard, and the algorithm is still a work in progress, it is fun to play with. Read more about the technology behind the app on Wolfram's blog here, or test it out with your own pictures here.

SEE ALSO: THE GLOBAL 20: Twenty big stories that define the world right now

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This robot competition inspired students and will get you excited about the future

Artificial Intelligence crushed all human records in the addictive tile game 2048 — here's how

$
0
0

By now, we’ve all heard of the addictive tile-mashing game called 2048. Last week, I picked up 2048 for the first time and — true to my nature — I started designing an AI to beat the game for me the following day.

It didn’t take me long to find out that there’s already some pretty good AIs out there, so I picked up the best 2048 AI I could find and fired several instances of it to see what it could do. Much to my surprise, it not only beat 2048 … it crushed every human record in 2048 that I could find.

Below is a video of the first 20 seconds of the AI hacking away at the game, mashing and merging tiles at superhuman speeds that we only wish we could match.

Like a multi-armed genius, the AI played 1,000 games of 2048 simultaneously without a hitch. Some games ended in a few minutes due to a series of unfortunate random tile spawns, while others nearly lasted 4 hours and reached scores previously thought impossible.

2048 ai score distributionThe worst instance achieved a score of 35,600, but even that instance managed to build the 2,048 tile and beat the game. Most instances ended with a score around 390,000 and a 16,384 tile, but the best instance built a 32,768 tile and stayed alive long enough to reach a score of 839,732.

As far as I know, this is the highest score achieved in 2048 without undos.

2048 ai highest tiles reachedPerhaps even more impressive is how consistently the AI beats 2048. The AI reached the 2,048 tile — and even the 4,096 tile — in all 1,000 games, and reached the 16,384 tile in a large majority of them. In one-third of the games, the AI astonishingly reached the 32,768 tile, though it wasn’t able to make it much further past that. (Though it’s theoretically possible, if you’re lucky.) 

2048 ai moves to reach tile

For the rest of this post, I’ll be looking at the game where the AI reached the high score of 839,732. In that instance, the AI beat the game in only 973 moves, which is about average for the AI.

What’s especially curious about the AI’s progression is that it tends to reach tile X in about (X / 2) moves. For example, the AI reached the 16,384 tile in about 8,000 moves. At that rate, the AI would theoretically reach the 131,072 tile (the theoretically largest tile) in about 65,500 moves — roughly 2x the number of moves it ended up lasting for — if the random tile spawns played out in its favor.

The AI’s 2048 strategy

To get a better understanding of how the AI managed to rack up such a high score, I analyzed its playing strategy on its highest-scoring game. Below, I’ll outline four useful playing tips that the AI adopted to beat 2048. Some of these tips are fairly well-known — and were even coded into the AI as heuristics — but I figured it’s good to cover the bases.

Following these tips will undoubtedly help you improve your game and — hopefully — beat 2048. Ultimately, however, your survival toward the end of the game relies heavily on the random tile spawns working out in your favor; one poorly placed tile can spell the doom of your game.

Tip #1: Keep your highest-value tile in one corner for the whole game

One of the earliest strategies that players discovered for beating 2048 was to keep your highest-value tile in one of the corners for the entire game and slowly build it up. Some writers even called this a major design flaw of 2048 because it tends to make the game (relatively) easy to beat.

2048-ai-1st-highest-tile-location

It’s no surprise, then, that the AI took advantage of this design flaw to beat 2048. In this game, the AI happened to choose the upper left corner, but all corners are equally viable. Pick one corner and stick to it.

Tip #2: Keep your highest-value tiles lined up

Another early strategy that 2048 players adopted was to maintain a row of monotonically increasing tiles as you build your main tile. I took a screenshot from my video above to demonstrate:

2048-ai-monotonic

Notice how the tiles are nicely lined up? The 64 is right next to the 32; the 32 is right next to the 16; and the 16 is right next to (what is about to become) the 8. When that line of 4's is combined into a 16, this configuration allows you to quickly compress the entire row into your next-highest tile and start again.

2048-ai-2nd-highest-tile-location

Unsurprisingly, the AI adopted this strategy as well. The AI chose the top row as its primary row and the second-highest-value tile on the board was consistently right next to the highest-value tile …

2048-ai-3rd-highest-tile-location

… and it kept the third-highest-value tile right next to the 2nd-highest-value tile in the top row. And so on. You’ll also notice that the AI often had the third-highest-value tile just under the highest-value tile as well, which I’m still trying to understand. Any thoughts?

Tip #3: Keep the squares occupied

Above, I mentioned that unfortunate random tile spawns can often spell the end of your game. One of the more interesting strategies that the AI seemed to adopt was to keep most of the squares occupied to reduce randomness and control where the tiles spawn.

Screen Shot 2015 05 23 at 12.19.26 PMFor most of the game, the AI maintained 12-15 (out of 16) tiles on the board and avoided merging too many tiles at once. While risky, this strategy ensures that tiles will spawn where you want them on the board.

2048-ai-squares-occupied

In this game, the AI kept the bottom-right corner of the board open so the low-value tiles would spawn around there, which it would then merge with nearby low-value tiles and move up the chain.

If you choose a different corner, make sure to use the diagonally opposite corner as your “spawning ground.”

Tip #4: Maximize the number of possible merges on the board

One of the mistakes that newer 2048 players tend to make is to try to merge everything quickly and leave as many squares open as possible. While such a strategy makes intuitive sense — more open squares means you’re less likely to get gridlocked — focusing on immediately merging everything actually leads to shorter games.

Screen Shot 2015 05 23 at 12.21.44 PMIn its best game, two-thirds of the moves the AI made resulted in 2+ possible tiles that could be merged. At the extreme, some moves resulted in 6+ possible tile merges, but of course not all those merges could be made at once.

Try playing a few games where you keep tiles lined up to merge — but don’t merge them until you have to — and see if you last longer than usual.

Have you beat this high score?

If you’ve beaten this high score in 2048 (with an AI or otherwise) without undos, please let me know in the comments below! I’d love to hear how this AI can be beaten.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This couple wants to turn America's roads into gigantic solar panels

A new Industrial Revolution is coming

$
0
0

robots

Over the past 25 years, the Internet has radically altered the way people communicate and share ideas and the way businesses interact with customers and clients.

For an even longer period, starting in the 1950s with the so-called Third Industrial Revolution, businesses have become more digitized. In the next few decades, a new industrial revolution will combine elements of these two trends, along with related technologies and practices, into a truly "smart" manufacturing process.

This convergence is known as the Industrial Internet, Industry 4.0 or the Industrial Internet of Things. Whatever the name, the result will profoundly affect global trade patterns, supply chains and societies. The impact will vary, presenting many opportunities for developed countries to be more disruptive in developing economies and possibly limiting the use of low-end manufacturing for quick modernization and development.

Nonetheless, this Fourth Industrial Revolution will change manufacturing, industry and society.

RTXQPKZ

The Impact of the Internet

Although the Internet grew out of military applications in the 1960s, the 1990s were when its true potential for non-military uses was realized. Some remarkable changes have occurred since then. The Internet almost single-handedly destroyed many service jobs, replacing travel agents, tax accountants, bank tellers and others. Despite the dot-com bubble burst, this disruption resulted in the creation of many jobs in the technology industry.

Connecting to the digital world has revolutionized how communication occurs and how information spreads through society. People have vast amounts of information at their fingertips, and with the advent of the smartphone they can access it anytime and anywhere. Outside of the business world, the Internet has altered the relationship between state actors and non-state actors in cyberwarfare. Issues such as privacy have routinely challenged governments and corporations. Nonetheless, the biggest impact has been on consumer markets. Anyone who uses the Internet is constantly bombarded by customized ads, and users can place orders from online stores more quickly than ever.

For consumer markets, clearly the next big thing is selling Internet-connected devices such as the new Apple Watch, fitness trackers, smart appliances and other wearable technologies. Many of the same tech companies driving the expansion of consumer-focused devices are also the vanguard of applying Silicon Valley innovations and developments elsewhere, including industry and infrastructure. While the focus on consumers is obvious, the underlying potential in industry could be more profound.

artificial intelligence robot

The Internet of Things

Whether the Internet of Things is used for consumer, industrial or other applications, at its heart it simply involves connecting devices to one another so they can communicate and become more efficient and effective. The Internet of Things and many of the different technologies it brings together and uses are not entirely new; the idea of the Internet of Things has existed for almost 20 years, but only now has the software and hardware developed enough for people to think about applying a wide range of its functions to the manufacturing process and industry.

There are now about two Internet-connected devices for each person on the planet, and that number could more than double within the next five years. Although most people tend to think of personal computers, tablets and smartphones as their main Internet-connected devices, these three categories together account for less than one-third of all connected devices. This share will drop in the future. To put the shift into perspective, just a decade ago personal computers accounted for more than two-thirds of all interconnected devices; now they account for less than 10 percent.

Maker Faire RobotsIn applying the Internet of Things toward industrial applications and supply chains, a number of associated technologies will affect industry in specific ways. Although each of them can be implemented individually — and many are already being used in some capacity — the Internet of Things is the glue that will bind them together, allowing seamless communication and analytics.

This relationship will likely form the backbone to any industrial advances in the coming years. To truly recognize the profound impact the Internet of Things has on industry, it is critical to look at the impact of some of the associated technologies.

Remote Sensors

Tiny remote sensors, continuously recording and transmitting information, would have applications in a wide range of industries, such as mining and energy. It would also have a critical multiplier effect between industries; for example, it could use information about the location of autonomous cars to more profitably sell ad space on electronic billboards.

Rethink Robotics Baxter

Robotics

Industrial robotics is hardly a new concept, but today's robots are becoming increasingly more applicable to a wide range of purposes. One of the biggest manufacturing jobs overseas is assembling smaller electronic goods such as cell phones by hand. This is a repeatable process that industrial robots could very easily perform, as evidenced by Foxconn's drive to use 1 million industrial robots. The biggest benefit of using industrial robots would be replacing laborers who work long hours with robots that can work continuously except for routine maintenance.

Additive and Digital Manufacturing

Additive manufacturing, otherwise known as 3-D printing, can be thought of as an extension of robotics. Additive manufacturing can be used to print simple spare parts such as nuts and bolts near or at an end user's location. However, its biggest impact will be its ability to produce structures and delicate products that simply could not be manufactured any other way. Additive manufacturing also has the potential to produce stronger, lighter designs than traditional mold-based manufacturing because it only uses the material necessary for fabrication.

RTR4BYA6The related concept of digital manufacturing uses computer-based design processes such as modeling, simulations and visualizations to create a design concept and define the production process in a computer. With the Internet of Things in the modern factory, the designs could move quickly into production.

Big Data

A crucial component of the Internet of Things is the connection between devices and data analytics software. It is important to tame the gigantic amount of data generated by the Internet and remote sensing, since data is expected to increase more than 50-fold in the next decade.

Predictive Analytics

Predictive analytics can have a wide range of applications. It can minimize unplanned maintenance in the manufacturing process through closer monitoring of equipment health and mitigate the risk of an equipment outage by using predictive maintenance algorithms.

Automated Transportation

Google has made headlines with the success of its automated vehicles that will soon be allowed on public roads. But cars are just one mode of transportation that is being automated. Amazon has envisioned delivery drones, and there is potential to automate cargo trucks and airplanes.

amazon droneTesting for this has already begun; Nevada has approved the testing of Daimler's automated 18-wheelers on public roads. This could be a game-changer for optimizing logistics for land-based supply chains and making them "smarter."

Smart Grids

Fossil fuels have long dominated the world's energy supply. This will not change soon, but alternative sources of energy, such as solar and wind, are now critical elements of the grid in many areas. As batteries and other forms of energy storage become integrated in power grids, smart grids will become more resilient and adaptable, limiting companies' exposure to blackouts. It will also allow more seamless integration between buying and selling electricity at the local level, decentralizing the power sector.

Smart Cities

Automated transportation networks, smart grids and other related concepts, such as real-time social media locations, will make cities "smart." This can allow more predictive pre-positioning of law enforcement, more effective disaster and evacuation protocols and, of course, more efficient energy usage and traffic flows.

The Big Picture

There is a significant difference between the industrial purposes and the consumer-driven purposes of the Internet of Things. The consumer-focused aspect is driven by innovations into applications without a built-up consumer base. For example, Apple, in a sense, created the smartphone market.

Big Data MiningIndustry, however, has been using many of the same principles for years. In most advanced economies — Germany, Japan, the United States and South Korea in particular — manufacturing and industry are highly digitized and automated, with frequent machine-to-machine communication. Companies have spent billions of dollars developing control systems and other connected systems.

This means that the use of the Internet of Things in industry will be more incremental than in consumer-focused applications, with evolutions happening at different times for different industries. However, regardless of the timetable, it is clear that industry is moving toward these applications.

One of the most significant outcomes of the Internet of Things in manufacturing will be the continued decentralization of the manufacturing process. The Internet has affected the dissemination of information, particularly in countries such as China, where the government tries to retain central control of information.

UberIn manufacturing, there is a clear trend toward more highly customized products for both consumers and companies. This requires flexibility in the manufacturing process and its supply and logistics chains to adapt to smaller orders and quickly shift from processing one order to another. This concept is also important because it lowers the cost barriers for developing a prototype product for companies of all sizes — even companies whose budget is a small Kickstarter campaign.

It is possible that a few decades from now, the Internet — as the backbone of modern and future industry — will be viewed with the same reverence as oil is today in its centrality to the economy.

The Developed World: Do The Rich Get Richer?

The countries set to adopt new technologies first and most effectively will see the largest benefits. This means the Industrial Internet will help create a manufacturing renaissance of sorts for low-end manufacturing in developed countries and reinforce high-end manufacturing in countries such as Germany and Japan. In short, wealthier countries are best suited to take advantage of this process.

3d printing manufacturingEven in places where the benefits will be the strongest, there will be significant disruption. Jobs will be created and destroyed. Countries like the United States and Germany have already seen most of the job destruction possible in the manufacturing sector, largely due to outsourcing. In a sense, there is not a lot to lose. However, the same is not true of the impact of the Internet of Things (and the Internet itself) on related industries. Automated vehicles, for example, will have a huge impact on the transportation of goods and services.

The Developing World: Will the PC-16 Exist?

On the opposite end of the spectrum, the industrial revolution will largely harm the developing world. More efficient, adaptive manufacturing located closer to end users is eroding the benefits of low labor costs. Interest in much of the developing world, where low-end manufacturing is prevalent, will decrease.

In countries where it is not widespread, such as most of Africa and the Middle East, the potential for a larger low-end manufacturing industry will be limited. Of course, there will always be a large market for cheap labor-produced, low-end manufactured goods — even if the Industrial Internet is widely implemented and perfected — but developing countries will not be able to attract as much investment in low-end manufacturing.

Maker Faire RobotsThe change in the developed world's manufacturing process will disrupt the 20th century's most consistent and widely used path for the complete modernization of a developing country.

For Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, China and even Germany, low-end manufacturing was crucial in developing their economy's industrial base quickly so they could catch up to — if not surpass — more developed economies. With cheap labor being offset by technology, fewer countries will be able to use low-end manufacturing as a growth catalyst.

China: A Unique Case

The impact of the Industrial Internet of Things on China is quite nuanced because Beijing is trying to balance two conflicting interests. On the one hand, Beijing's biggest fear is social unrest, and managing the social effects of any changes on its large migrant work force is Beijing's top priority. On the other hand, Beijing also knows that in many coastal cities labor costs are becoming exceedingly high. Many low-end manufacturing jobs cannot remain in China with labor costs in other countries, principally Southeast Asia, lagging far beyond coastal China's.

beijing train stationBeijing knows it must adapt to prevent its own version of offshoring, so it has made it a high priority to elevate the sophistication of its industry to the same level as neighboring South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. China is the world's fastest growing market for industrial robots. It is quickly becoming the country with the most Internet-connected devices and is making significant strides in the adoption of additive manufacturing. However, the risk for Beijing is that these changes happen too quickly, causing short-term labor disruptions that require Beijing's swift intervention.

For China, the integration of the Internet into the manufacturing process can be thought of as an extension of the recent, rapid development of its technology, information and communications technology sectors. Although China lags behind the West in many areas of science and technology, it is becoming more competitive in engineering and high technology and could very soon rival all but the United States in those areas.

china auto factory hainan province

China already has a robust startup culture in first-tier cities, whose technology corporations are performing well internationally. Weibo, the Chinese blogging site, even created a computer that bested Google and Microsoft in an artificial intelligence competition in May.

China's end goal is to leapfrog traditional evolutions in the manufacturing process, like South Korea and Japan did, and move directly to a highly automated, integrated and flexible manufacturing process that can compete in all strands of manufacturing with any country. Regardless of the short-term labor disruptions, if Beijing does not adapt, more jobs are likely to be lost, aggravating the Chinese economic slowdown and potential unemployment problems.

Cyberattacks: The Modern Arab Oil Embargo?

The biggest limitation on the Industrial Internet may not come from governments, policies or the development of the technologies, but rather the safety, integrity and security of companies' operations. Although machine-to-machine communication has been prevalent in manufacturing for decades, historically the network for that communication was closed and thus not as susceptible to external threats as networks connected to the Internet.

Some industries already are coping with the threat of cyberattacks that go beyond bringing down websites or stealing information. In March 2014, researchers at Symantec documented that attacks by the hacker group Energetic Bear had begun to focus on the energy sector, specifically targeting control systems for energy grid operators, pipeline operators and others.

Cyber securityThere have also been reports suggesting that hackers caused a mysterious explosion along a Turkish pipeline in 2008. In 2012, Saudi Aramco was the target of cyberattacks that infected more than 30,000 Aramco computers. System security requires constant upgrades to adapt to more innovative attacking schemes.

If the Industrial Internet is analogous to oil in its importance to industry, then a cyberattack aimed at disrupting a country's industry would be equivalent to the Arab Oil Embargo as a political weapon. Even if the physical security of systems linked to the Internet can be guaranteed, a cyberattack that affects large portions of the Internet could have notable economic effects on a country.

Of course, the impact would vary greatly from country to country. Since some countries will benefit from the Industrial Internet more than others, this also means that some countries will be more reliant on information technology. Isolating the United States from the rest of the Internet, even for a few hours, would be catastrophic for the U.S. economy, but isolating North Korea would merely be an interesting headline. Such disparities and potential impacts are undoubtedly a major issue, and countries such as the United States are incorporating cyberspace into their national security doctrines accordingly.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 70 people were injured while filming this movie with 100 untamed lions


IBM's supercomputer Watson ingested 2,000 TED Talks and can answer your deepest questions

$
0
0

IBM Watson TED

What is the relationship between money and psychology? 

What is the secret to happiness? 

What is the meaning of life?

These are the kinds of deep questions TED Talks have long been exploring. Now, with the help of IBM's cognitive computer Watson, the answers may be just a click away.

Watson, an artificially intelligent computer that doesn't just follow commands but learns over time, ingested about 2,000 TED Talks and organized them based on the content of the lectures.

It maps out talks by topics and insights about the speakers, allowing users to easily browse the vast TED archives.

It also lets users ask Watson any question they can dream up. Within seconds, they receive an answer in the form of relevant clips from the talks.

For instance, when you ask about the secret to happiness, Watson serves up a series of short video segments where speakers most accurately answer the question. In one, TED speaker and Harvard psychologist Dan Gilbert says, "The secret of happiness — here it is, finally to be revealed: First, accrue wealth, power, and prestige. Then lose it."

From there, users can click through to watch the entire talk or else ask another burning question.

IBM Watson TED answer

The Watson-TED partnership began last winter when Dario Gil, a VP of Science and Technology for IBM Research, met TED.com editor Emily McManus backstage after giving a talk. They chatted about the possibilities of applying the powerful Watson technology to TED's video archives.

This year, IBM developers started playing with the data. For about two months, a team of eight worked on the project under wraps, referring to the effort as Secret Squirrel.

The result is what Kai Young, IBM Watson Group program director, calls a "discovery engine."

"It allows you to discover ideas and make connections," Young tells Business Insider. "We can move beyond keywords to the actual ideas and insights that are part of the speakers' content. A lot of different signals — silences, points of applause, laughter — help to understand a video, rather than just the description someone gave it."

The program is currently in alpha testing, and IBM expects the beta version to be available by the end of the summer. Users can sign up to try it on watson.ted.com.

IBM Watson Ted personality insights

Developers are currently focusing on training Watson to better interpret and answer questions posed in natural language. Since it learns over time, it will continue evolving and improving.

Young sees several future applications of the technology for TED, as well as for other media providers.

For example, IBM is working on a function where users could connect their Twitter accounts, and Watson would recommend talks based on their unique personalities and interests.

Young says Watson's technology could also someday be used to find and surface online classes, internet videos, and digital journalism.

As of now, Watson has no plans to give a TED Talk.

SEE ALSO: The 20 Most Popular TED Talks Of All Time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This robot competition inspired students and will get you excited about the future

How to keep super-intelligent robots like Ultron from killing us all

$
0
0

Ultron (James Spader) in Marvel's Avengers: Age of Ultron

In the most recent installment of Marvel's Avengers franchise, the artificial intelligence Ultron is hell-bent on exterminating humanity. In Ultron's own words, "I was designed to save the world," but the robot ultimately concludes that when it comes to humans, "there's only one path to peace: your extinction."

The advances that scientists are now making with artificial intelligence lead many to suggest--and fear--that we may be on the verge of creating artificial intelligences smarter than we are. If humanity does succeed in developing an artificial super-intelligence, how might we prevent an Age of Ultron? That is exactly the kind of problem that Nick Bostrom, director of the Future of Humanity Institute at the University of Oxford, tackled in his 2014 book Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies.

The fact that Ultron wants to save the world by eradicating humanity is what Bostrom might call "perverse instantiation"--an A.I. discovering some way of satisfying its final goal that violates the intentions of the programmers who defined the goal. For example, if one asks an A.I. to make a person smile, the computer might try manipulating facial nerves to paralyze the face into constantly smiling. If one then asks the machine to make us happy, the computer might then simply implant electrodes into the pleasure centers of our brains.

Bostrom notes that even apparently innocent goals could doom the human race if not thought out properly. For example, if an A.I. is tasked with proving or disproving the Riemann hypothesis, one of the most important, unsolved problems in mathematics, it might pursue this goal by trying to convert the entire solar system into a computer, including the atoms in the bodies of whomever once cared about the answer. Similarly, an A.I. designed to maximize paperclip production might try to convert first the Earth and then increasingly large chunks of the observable universe into stationery.

Keeping super-intelligence in line

One might argue that dumb A.I.s pose more realistic threats than hyper-smart ones. However, if artificial super-intelligence is even a remote possibility, Bostrom cautions one should not take any chances with it. A dumb A.I. might cause a war crime or crash the stock market, but an artificial super-intelligence could end civilization.

"It is key that we solve this problem before somebody figures out how to create machine super-intelligence," Bostrom says."We should start to do research on this control problem today, since we don't know how hard the problem might be, nor how much time we will have available to work out a solution."

There are two broad classes of methods for how one might keep an artificial super-intelligence from destroying the world, Bostrom says. One involves controlling an A.I.'s capabilities--perhaps by preventing it from having access to the Internet or by not giving it any physical manipulators such as robotic arms.

While limiting what an artificial super-intelligence might do could be useful in the initial stages of developing such a machine, "we can't expect to keep a super-intelligent genie locked up in its bottle forever, or even for a short time," Bostrom says. For instance, an artificial super-intelligence might develop ways to trick any human gatekeepers to let it out of its “box.” Human beings are not secure systems, especially not when pitched against a super-intelligent schemer, he notes.

Modified goals

Instead, Bostrom advises shaping what artificial super-intelligences want to do so that even if they were able to cause great harm, they would choose not to do so. One strategy would involve directly specifying a set of rules for an A.I. to follow, such as Isaac Asimov's famed Three Laws of Robotics. However, this poses the challenge of choosing which rules we would want to guide the A.I. and the difficulty of expressing those values in computer code.

A second alternative involves giving an A.I. only modest goals and limited ambitions. However, care would have to be taken in defining how the A.I. should minimize its impact on the world. A third option would involve creating an A.I. that is not super-intelligent, making sure it would want to act benevolently, and then augmenting it so that it becomes super-intelligent while ensuring it does not get corrupted in the process.

A final possibility Bostrom suggests involves telling an artificial super-intelligence to figure out a way to make itself safe. "We try to leverage the A.I.'s intelligence to learn what we value, or to predict which actions we would have approved of," Bostrom says. Essentially, the plan would be to develop an artificial super-intelligence that can figure out what we want, and not just follow what we say.

Still, even this strategy might not prevent a robot apocalypse. "It is not sufficient that the A.I. learns about our values; its motivation system must also be constructed in such a way that it is motivated to pursue them," Bostrom says.

SEE ALSO: IBM's Watson computer can now do in a matter of minutes what it takes cancer doctors weeks to perform

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Meet 4 Incredibly Sophisticated Robots Designed To Live With Humans

Facebook opens an artificial intelligence lab in Paris

$
0
0

facebook AI director yann lecun

Facebook has opened an artificial intelligence laboratory in Paris, France — its third — as the race is on to build smarter machines that can make better sense of our huge amounts of data.

Back in March, Facebook CTO Mike Schroepfer identified artificial intelligence as one of the social network's three big bets on the future.

The problem: Facebook's more than 1 billion users are putting more pictures, video, and stuff on the platform than we can keep track of, he said.

Artificial intelligence, also called machine learning, can help Facebook automatically process all of that data and make it more useful to users (and, potentially, advertisers). If Facebook has an algorithm to detect what's in a photo or video, it can sort it more efficiently. 

To that end, Facebook AI Research (FAIR) has opened this Paris office to recruit "some of the best researchers in the world," as Facebook AI Director Yann LeCun says in a blog entry. The other two offices are in New York and Silicon Valley's Menlo Park. 

"It's our hope that this research will ultimately help us make services like News Feed, photos, and search even better and enable an entirely new set of ways to connect and share," LeCun writes.

In that blog post, LeCun promises that the FAIR Paris team will work both with those other two offices and with European AI teams to share and disseminate the research it produces. 

There's an artificial intelligence arms race a-brewing: Google is building a lot of machine learning features into the next version of Android to make its Google Now feature more useful without the need to switch apps, and Microsoft's Cortana digital assistant is supposed to get smarter the more you use it.

Facebook's investment in and expansion of FAIR is just a preview of what comes next when we start building smarter machines. 

SEE ALSO: Google just showed us one area where it's miles ahead of Apple

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Facebook's ridiculously large drones will beam internet from the sky

How Google created the world's smartest photo app (GOOG)

$
0
0

google photos

Google's new Photos app doesn't just store and organize your photos — it actually knows who and what are in them. 

It knows what your dog looks like, when and where you last ate pizza, and can automatically pull all of the photos of your 9-year-old niece from the time she was first born up until her most recent birthday into a neat album. 

Google is hoping this new Photos app becomes the single digital hub for all of your memories, and it seeks to differentiate itself from rivals like Apple and Dropbox in two ways: by making your photos just as searchable as an email in Gmail or a link on the web, and by offering free unlimited storage for photos that are 16-megapixels in size and under.

"We kind of decided about a year ago that we wanted to rebuild things from the ground up," David Lieb, the product lead for Google Photos, told Business Insider. 

An app that gets smarter the more you use it

Google uses machine learning to power the scary-accurate image recognition within the Photos app, and based on the demo I've seen, it's incredibly fast and accurate. Other services let you search photos based on when they were taken, where they were taken, and how you've tagged them.

But with Photos, you can simply type in the word "pizza," and any photos you've taken of pizza will pop up whether you've labeled the pictures or not. If you went rock climbing last summer, you can type in the phrase "rock climbing" to find those images. Google also automatically sorts photos based on these types of phrases in the Categories section. So, all of the photos of any given person will appear in one organized album, all photos of food would be in another, etc. 

Google already uses machine learning — a term that refers to a type of algorithm that learns on its own without human intervention — for many of its products, including Google Now, Google Maps, and Search. But now we're seeing it being applied to photo storage.

GooglePhotosSearch

There were two aspects that Google focused on the most when developing the new Photos app: making sure you can search using broad words and phrases that feel natural rather than keywords, and making sure the app is easy to use. 

"The design of the app is probably the thing that spent the most time iterating and getting right," Lieb said. 

To decide which features should be included in the app, Google brought in outside testers to determine what would resonate with actual users — a common tactic in most product development. Google also spent time testing paper prototypes of the app for months to get the design right. 

"We put [the app] in front of real users and said please take these components we put in front of you and construct the app you want," Lieb said.

GooglePhotos

That also means dozens of features were cut from the app that didn't make it into the final version. Google initially tested a layout that was similar to the Gallery app on Android phones — it would show you the folders on your phone like, Camera, Downloads, etc. But testers didn't seem to be into that layout — 98% of them would just click the Camera category and ignore the other ones, Lieb said.

"So we decided to show all of those photos in a single view so the user doesn't have to decide," he said.

But, layout aside, it's really Google's advanced machine learning technology that powers the app. 

"At Google I/O, you heard Sundar (Google's SVP of product) talk on stage about how Google has been making machine learning investments for decades now," Lieb said. "So we do actually have the best capability in the machine learning realm. Applying that to photos is one example, but we have many."

The new Photos app is available for download on the desktop, iOS, and Android.  

SEE ALSO: Google just took the lead in the dangerous game called 'Race To Zero'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This new documentary reveals how taking photos of everything defines our lives now

Physicist and Star Trek screenwriter Leonard Mlodinow: "In 2035, we'll all be part of one giant social network"

$
0
0

Physicist Leonard Mlodinow

Renowned physicist and Star Trek screenwriter Leonard Mlodinow has some pretty awe ome predictions about the future, which we got to hear when we caught up with him recently here in New York.

For one, Mlodinow (who, by the way, has co-written a book with Stephen Hawking, written for popular TV shows such as MacGyver and Star Trek: The Next Generation, and currently teaches physics at Cal Tech) thinks we'll all be part of one giant social network in the next 20 years. 

"You’ll probably just have something embedded in you," he told Business Insider , "a microchip of sorts or some interface...and it’s just easier to talk to anyone in the world immediately."

He has some insights on the state of the world now, too, especially on people who say they don't believe in climate change.

"I think they’re totally ignorant. They have no idea how to approach the problem or what the evidence is and probably haven’t read the literature," Mlodinow said. "If they deny the science the science in that area, they should not trust MRI machines or X-rays and they shouldn’t use a cell phone."

Here's a transcript of our whole conversation with Mlodinow, edited lightly for clarity and length.

BUSINESS INSIDER: To the casual observer, you have an incredibly varied history.

LEONARD MLODINOW: I became a physicist, worked in academic physics as faculty at Cal tech, and went into writing for Hollywood, went into computer games, and went into writing books and teaching at Caltech again.

BI: How did you end up as a screenwriter for "Star Trek: The Next Generation?"

LM: Well, I got that job because they’d read something I’d written for MacGyver and they liked it and they hired me. When I was as Caltech I started writing screenplays. I used to write short stories just for fun. And when I got the job at Caltech, having come from Northern California — where people are rather prejudiced against Southern California — I was too. And I’m thinking, ‘What will I do in Southern California? If I go there I’m gonna write screenplays to see what happens. And I started knocking on doors and I quit doing physics and got an apartment in Hollywood and started writing and got a really crappy job for a really crappy show, but I lived off writing for that show for a while, and it got better and I got an agent and a better show and just climbed my way up. 

stephen hawking brief history of time

BI: You’ve cowritten a book with Stephen Hawking. He says in the next 100 years computers will be smarter than humans and surpass us in artificial intelligence. What do you think?

LM: It’s possible — I wouldn’t say it’s outrageous. I wouldn’t think that neither he nor I knows, and neither of us will be around in the next 100 years to be disproved.

I guess I should remind you that he said in the 1980’s that by the end of the century, we would solve all of physics. We would have the unified theory of everything. And in 2005 I was talking to him and I brought that up and I said, ‘What do you think now?’ And he said, ‘I still think by the end of the century we’re gonna have everything solved.’ So, he seems to think that by the end of the century, whatever century you’re in, everything will be done. And if it isn’t, then he says the same thing again when the next century starts. Knowing him, he might be around next century.

But I think that the kind of computers we’ve built today are in general nothing like how the brain works. The brain is a massively paralleled processor and we are starting to use parallel processing and they used that in the LHC [Large Hadron Collider) to analyze the data. But, I don’t know. There’s a long way to go, it’s a long time, and people are working on the problem.

Who will ever know? How do you even judge? A computer is much different from a brain. Are we going to have something with like 86 billion transistors that are each connected to a thousand or ten thousand other ones? Probably not quite like that. How will we know? I don’t think the Turing test is a really good way of answering that question. It’ll be a different kind of intelligence.

BI: In your mind, what will society look like in the next 20 years? The next 100 years?

LM: In the next 100 years, I have no idea, and I don’t think anyone does, so if they tell you, they’re just making it up. In the next 20 years, I can look back to 1995 and I can take that difference and then move it forward. I feel like the explosion of mass communication will continue and we will be even more connected and easily connected to other people than we are today without having to carry around these devices. Information is very fluid and easy to access — what we’ll do with that, I don’t know. I think that’s the next step, because you can drown in that information and also a lot of the information floating about is false — it’s wrong information so I think those are the challenges to be able to do something constructive with it and be able to tell what’s right from wrong.

Our social networking is exploding. We can be in contact with so many more people than years ago. In 20 years, you’ll probably just have something embedded in you  — a microchip of sorts or some interface and it’s just easier to talk to anyone in the world immediately. I think we’re all going to be one giant network.

matrix code

 BI: In your new book The Upright Thinkers you examine how humans have evolved to where they are today. What drives us as human beings to continue exploring the world around us?

LM: That, I think, is a fundamental part of our nature. It’s a kind of curiosity about where we fit in. What is the world? How does it work and how do we fit in? It’s something that you can see in very young infants, and you can see it in all cultures and it’s a fundamental quality of being human.

BI: Can science and religion — or spirituality, as some would call it, be reconciled?

LM: I think that this dichotomy is something that is fairly recent. First of all, when the brain evolved to have the capacity to ask such questions, to understand abstractions, and to be curious, one of the first things we started doing was asking these spiritual questions. Humans used to live as nomads wandering around and leaving their sick behind to die and leaving the bodies behind, because they couldn’t carry them with. 

And then the first human settlements in the Agricultural Revolution, where we domesticated plants and animals and started living in one place, was really driven by these spiritual questions and the desire to be near our departed loved ones. And that’s where we really started to ask questions about the world around us. In fact, chemistry came from embalming people trying to preserve the bodies, and so science grew out of those spiritual questions. The first scientists were doing science to try to get closer to God.

The first scientists were doing science to try to get closer to God.

Robert Boyle — the chemist, Newton — the physicist, Darwin. People misunderstand them. They started making their investigations as a way of understanding God’s plan for the world, so that was all part of it until very recently.

 

Certainly since Darwin, there have been people who have opposed ideas based on religious fundamentalism, but Darwin for instance was able to reconcile. He was a religious man, and he was able to reconcile evolution with religion. He didn’t have a problem with that. He just said, ‘Well, God put everything on the Earth in a certain habitat with a plan that would evolve and that’s what’s happening.’ He eventually became an atheist — it’s when his daughter died at age 10 that he lost his faith in God.

BI: You’ve explored the concept of randomness in the past. In your opinion, are humans in control of their own destinies or are they puppets in a play, so to speak?

LM: Well, puppets implies that something else is controlling you, and I think it’s neither. We certainly have the experience or feeling of controlling our own behavior.

Whether some being with infinite or extreme intelligence or data on the state of our bodies could predict what we are going to do beforehand because it’s predetermined by the laws of nature — maybe that’s true. I don’t believe in free will, literally. 

I don’t believe in free will, literally. 

I believe that the laws of nature govern your actions. On some level, what you’re doing is not your choice but it’s governed by the state of your body right now. But we have no way of knowing that. It’s far too complex. 

 

 

BI: What are your thoughts on the fact that a lot of people in this country do not believe in evolution?

LM: They’re misguided. I think it’s destructive. It’s not only evolution — it’s people who don’t accept or respect science, and make uninformed judgments about a lot of political and medical issues. These are important issues, and I feel it’s unfortunate that we have people like that in this country. 

BI: There are people that argue that climate change is part of the natural cycle, as opposed to it being man-made, what are your thoughts on that?

LM: I think they’re totally ignorant. They have no idea how to approach the problem or what the evidence is and probably haven’t read the literature and that there are thousands of scientists who have been studying this for years and are experts and devote their lives to it.

To dismiss them because you happen to have a different opinion as if one could look at the weather report and understand global climate change is arrogant and ignorant. Among climate scientists, a fraction don’t accept it, so I think it’s been definitively proven using methods of modern science — the same methods that bring us airplanes and GPS systems and lasers and MRI machines that these people all use. If they deny the science the science in that area, they should not trust MRI machines or X-rays and they shouldn’t use a cell phone. They don’t get vaccinated either, I assume.

Mars

BI: Are there other forms of life out there in the universe?

LM: We have no evidence that there is, and we can’t even theoretically say what the chances are, because we found a lot of stars that are like the sun, and a lot of planets that exist in the habitable zone.

So there’s certainly the raw materials for aliens and for intelligent life.

We know that once you have some form of life, like a bacteria, that it can evolve to intelligent life, but we still don’t know how to explain the first creation of DNA, RNA, or the macromolecules of basic life — how they came into being. People are getting closer and closer to understanding that, but we don’t really know. This is one thing I have faith in, that I have intuition that there is, but from the scientific point of view you can’t say.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what happens when you get bitten by a black widow

This Japanese company taught a robot to wield a katana like a master swordsman

$
0
0

Fictional robots are often remarkably capable, but their real life counterparts frequently have trouble navigating something as simple as a door.

That's changing rapidly. And in a perfect example of just how capable robots really can be, Japanese robotics company Yaskawa Electric Corporation had one of the most skilled swordsmen in the world teach one of their creations how to use a katana.

master swordsman 1c

Isao Machii holds multiple speed and skill world records for his mastery of the martial art of Iaijutsu and his ability with a sword. master swordsman 2

So the company modeled his abilities in 3D to see how perfectly their robot could replicate Machii's efforts.

swordsman machine 3

Each challenge requires incredibly precise movement.

swordsman machine 4

And quick, definitive action.

swordsman machine 5

Just in case that wasn't precise enough for you, watch this.

swordsman machine 6

Yes, this is just one robot programmed to do a specific task. Still... Are we sure this is a good idea?

Watch the full video on YouTube to see the machine's attempt to replicate Machii's 1,000 cut challenge:

 

[H/T Kotaku]

SEE ALSO: The paleontologist who worked on 'Jurassic World' is trying to create a real dinosaur within 5 to 10 years

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's what it's like to slingshot with a parachute out of a hot air balloon at 16,000 feet

Google: The artificial intelligence we're working on won't destroy humanity (GOOG)

$
0
0

terminator arnold schwarzenegger

Mustafa Suleyman, one of the cofounders of Google's artificial intelligence research company Google DeepMind, emphasised in a talk that researching AI isn't going to destroy humanity.

Suleyman, speaking at Playfair Capital's AI2015 conference, stressed that Google DeepMind is being developed to improve Google's existing service.

“The narrative has changed from ‘isn’t it terrible that AI is such a failure?’ to ‘isn’t it terrible that AI is such a success?’" Suleyman said. "We are building it to empower humanity, not destroy us.” 

Here's a still taken from a Periscope stream by Rodolo Rosini. It shows one of Suleyman's slides about the ethics of AI:

Google DeepMind AI slide

The slide recognises that AI is "hugely powerful," but emphasises that humanity is able to control it. Suleyman explained in his talk that AI is built with limits and controls that stop it doing harm. 

Entrepreneurs like Elon Musk and Bill Gates have expressed concern about the rapid developments in artificial intelligence. Musk, who invested in Google DeepMind before its acquisition by Google, previously warned in a now-deleted internet comment that robots could start killing us within five years.

But Suleyman isn't as concerned as his investor. His presentation made it clear that AI is there to help humanity, not destroy it. Besides, he said, there are more urgent concerns out there. He spent several minutes showing slides depicting impending natural disasters. That's what we should be worried about, he said.

Here, via The Wall Street Journal, is what Suleyman said about the potential threat from AI:

On existential risk, our perspective is that it’s become a real distraction from the core ethics and safety issues, and it’s completely overshadowed the debate,” Suleyman said. ”The way we think about AI is that it’s going to be a hugely powerful tool that we control and that we direct, whose capabilities we limit, just as you do with any other tool that we have in the world around us, whether they’re washing machines or tractors. We’re building them to empower humanity and not to destroy us.

One of the questions that Suleyman received after his talk was about DeepMind's ethics board. The Wall Street Journal reports that Google created a board of people who make sure that DeepMind's AI development remains safe and legal. But it has never released the names of the people, and again refused to do so at the conference. All Suleyman had to see about DeepMind's ethics board was that "We will make it public in due course."

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Kids settle the debate and tell us which is better: an Apple or Samsung phone


Ocado is creating an army of humanoid robots with artificial intelligence

$
0
0

SecondHands_closeangleshot

Ocado is creating an army of robots to pick your groceries for you.

The humanoid robots will use artificial intelligence, machine learning and advanced vision systems to eventually "increase safety, efficiency, and productivity in the workplace."

Online grocer Ocado, which is is the "Amazon of food" and one of Britain's most exciting tech companies, revealed in an emailed statement that it is developing a league of robots under the "SecondHands project" to understand and support human workers.

Ocado will work with a consortium of universities to create an autonomous humanoid robot which could later be used across various work places.

But it's not looking to replace humans with the robots – it's looking to help them out. Ocado says that it wants to create a robot that can offer assistance with difficult maintenance jobs, such as handing tools to human technicians, and manipulate objects like ladders, pneumatic cylinders and bolts.

“The ultimate aim is for humans to end up relying on collaborative robots because they have become an active participant in their daily tasks,” said Dr Graham Deacon, Robotics Research Team Leader at Ocado Technology, in a statement. “In essence the SecondHands robot will know what to do, when to do it and how to do it in a manner that a human can depend on.”

The SecondHands project will be completed over five years and is part of the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme, which includes one of the worlds largest civilian robotics programmes. Horizon 2020 is the EU's initiative to fund major development in science and technology across the 28 nation bloc.

The ambitions for Ocado's project are pretty incredible. The SecondHands project wants robots to have the cognitive and perceptive ability to "understand when the operator is in need of help, understand how this help can be given and provide relevant assistance."

Ex Machina robot

The AI component is intended to allow the robot to "progressively acquire skills and knowledge needed to provide assistance. In fact, it will even anticipate the needs of the maintenance technician and execute the appropriate tasks without prompting."

Scientists are also looking to develop advanced 3D vision systems to allow the robot to "estimate the 3D articulated pose of humans and offer support when it is needed without being asked." In other words, to see what help a human worker needs and offer it without prompting.

Finally, scientists hope to install a humanoid shape and human-like flexibility that will enable natural collaboration between humans and the robot. This means the robot will be able to understand and determine how to interact with living and inanimate objects — like knowing when to grip more tightly when picking up a hammer, as opposed to an apple.

Ocado is racking up massive revenue growth and creating a whole heap of technology that it can hive off and sell on to other businesses should it wish. Its revenues grew by 20% to nearly £1 billion ($1.5 billion) in 2014.

Last month, Business Insider reported on how Ocado is developing a raft of new warehouse robots to cut costs and increase efficiency.

Ocado employs ten robotics experts, from leading robotics research institutions, such as The University of Edinburgh and Imperial College London. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 cool tricks your iPhone can do with the latest iOS update

IBM's big gamble on artificial intelligence faces one major hurdle

$
0
0

ginni rometty ibm watson

Ginni Rometty, the CEO of IBM, is betting big on Watson, the company's flagship artificial intelligence system.

Last month, she predicted a future in which "every decision that mankind makes is going to be informed by a cognitive system like Watson."

But to make that future a reality, IBM has a huge task in front of it — beyond just refining and advancing the Watson system. It must convince companies, who are hardly clamoring for a technology most people can hardly understand, that "cognitive computing" — where computers are involved in decision-making, not just data-crunching — is something they actually need.

That's a core point in a recent report from Outsell, Inc., a research and advisory firm. 

"For all of the indisputable progress and achievements the Watson program has made so far, IBM still faces one overriding challenge: to demonstrate that it is not just a technology in search of a problem," writes Simon Alterman, a VP and lead analyst with Outsell. "Watson is no doubt a formidable hammer, but it needs to find enough nails to prove its worth. The market is new, and its potential customers don’t yet know what a nail-shaped problem looks like."

IBM seems to recognize this challenge. That's why members of its Watson group spend up to six weeks with potential clients, according to the Outsell report, understanding their problems and then explaining how Watson could solve them (of course).

The artificial intelligence system, still best-known to the general public for its much-publicized Jeopardy! win, is already hard at work in finance, oncology, healthcare, and other fields. If Rometty's prediction about the future is true, that list will rapidly grow.

But first IBM has some convincing to do. 

SEE ALSO: The CEO of IBM just made a bold prediction about the future of artificial intelligence

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Microsoft's Insane Holographic Computer In Action

Twitter is joining Google and Facebook in the artificial intelligence arms race (TWTR)

$
0
0

jack dorsey

The changing of the guard in Twitter's executive suite hasn't put a halt to the company's M&A activity.

On Wednesday, Twitter announced that it has acquired Whetlab, a startup focused on machine learning technology. 

The financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. Whetlab said it will shut down its service effective July 15.

It's not immediately clear why Twitter decided to acquire Whetlab. But its machine learning technology potentially has a lot of use-cases for Twitter, like in surfacing more relevant tweets for the users or targeting better ads. 

The deal is Twitter's second acquisition of a machine learning tech company, following the acquisition of Madbits last July. The deals come as Internet rivals Google and Facebook are increasingly investing in artificial intelligence technology.

Whetlab's small team will also join Twitter following the acquisition. Its small team is comprised of a bunch of PhDs, including Ryan Adams, assistant professor of computer science at Harvard University, and Hugo Larochelle, an assistant professor at the Université de Sherbrooke.

Here's what Whetlab wrote about the acquisition on its website:

"Over the past year, we have created a technology to make machine learning better and faster for companies, automatically. Twitter is the platform for open communication on the internet and we believe that Whetlab’s technology can have a great impact by accelerating Twitter’s internal machine learning efforts."

SEE ALSO: Twitter's biggest problem in one chart

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: 5 clever iPhone tricks only power users know about

The 20 most creative paintings ever — according to a computer

$
0
0

The_Scream

Creativity and art are usually thought of as the domains of humans.

But computer scientists from Rutgers University have designed an algorithm that shows that computers may be just as skilled at critiquing artwork. By judging paintings based on their novelty and influence, the mathematical algorithm selected the most creative paintings and sculptures of each era.

The study, published in arxiv, found that more often than not, the computer chose what most art historians would also agree are groundbreaking works, like Edvard Munch's "The Scream" and Pablo Picasso's "The Young Ladies of Avignon."

Scroll down to see which paintings made the cut, and why.

The algorithm's network included over 62,000 paintings spanning 550 years and some of the most well-known names in art history, from the Renassaince era to the age of pop art. This painting by Lorenzo di Credi is often called the Dreyfus Madonna, after Gustav Dreyfus, one of its longtime owners.



The paintings were arranged on a timeline according to the date it was made, so each painting could be critiqued with a historical point of view. The algorithm looked for paintings that differed from the work that came before to measure its novelty. This fresco mural by Andrea Mantegna decorates one of the walls in a castle in Mantua, Italy.





The computer algorithm also weighed how influential each painting was by looking at paintings that imitated its style. Leonardo da Vinci painted this portrait of St. John the Baptist late in his career, leading an artistic era called Mannerism, which is characterized by exaggerated poses.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Google just announced that its AI has dreams and here's what they look like

$
0
0

google ai dreams

What do machines dream of? New images released by Google give us one potential answer: hypnotic landscapes of buildings, fountains and bridges merging into one.

The pictures, which veer from beautiful to terrifying, were created by the company’s image recognition neural network, which has been “taught” to identify features such as buildings, animals and objects in photographs.

They were created by feeding a picture into the network, asking it to recognise a feature of it, and modify the picture to emphasise the feature it recognises.

That modified picture is then fed back into the network, which is again tasked to recognise features and emphasise them, and so on. Eventually, the feedback loop modifies the picture beyond all recognition.

At a low level, the neural network might be tasked merely to detect the edges on an image. In that case, the picture becomes painterly, an effect that will be instantly familiar to anyone who has experience playing about with photoshop filters:

google ai dreamsBut if the neural network is tasked with finding a more complex feature – such as animals – in an image, it ends up generating a much more disturbing hallucination:

knight ai google dreams

Ultimately, the software can even run on an image which is nothing more than random noise, generating features that are entirely of its own imagination.

noise to banana ai dreams google

Here’s what happens if you task a network focused on finding building features with finding and enhancing them in a featureless image:

google ai dreams

The pictures are stunning, but they’re more than just for show. Neural networks are a common feature of machine learning: rather than explicitly programme a computer so that it knows how to recognise an image, the company feeds it images and lets it piece together the key features itself.

dumbbellsBut that can result in software that is rather opaque. It’s difficult to know what features the software is examining, and which it’ has overlooked. For instance, asking the network to discover dumbbells in a picture of random noise reveals it thinks that a dumbbell has to have a muscular arm gripping it.

The solution might be to feed it more images of dumbbells sitting on the ground, until it understands that the arm isn’t an intrinsic part of the dumbbell.

“One of the challenges of neural networks is understanding what exactly goes on at each layer. We know that after training, each layer progressively extracts higher and higher-level features of the image, until the final layer essentially makes a decision on what the image shows. For example, the first layer may look for edges or corners. Intermediate layers interpret the basic features to look for overall shapes or components, such as a door or a leaf. The final few layers assemble those into complete interpretations – these neurons activate in response to very complex things such as entire buildings or trees,” explain the Google engineers on the company’s research blog.

google ai dreams“One way to visualise what goes on is to turn the network upside down and ask it to enhance an input image in such a way as to elicit a particular interpretation,” they add. “Say you want to know what sort of image would result in ‘banana’. Start with an image full of random noise, then gradually tweak the image towards what the neural net considers a banana.”

The image recognition software has already made it into consumer products. Google’s new photo service, Google Photos, features the option to search images with text: entering “dog”, for instance, will pull out every image Google can find which has a dog in it (and occasionally images with other quadrupedal mammals, as well).

So there you have it: Androids don’t just dream of electric sheep; they also dream of mesmerising, multicoloured landscapes.

This article originally appeared on guardian.co.uk

This article was written by Alex Hern from The Guardian and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network.

SEE ALSO: KURZWEIL: Human-Level AI Is Coming By 2029

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Benedict Cumberbatch And The Cast Of 'The Imitation Game' Have Mixed Feelings About Artificial Intelligence

Viewing all 1375 articles
Browse latest View live